hyundai kona equivalent
Hyundai Kona Hybrid vs Kia Niro Hybrid
The Hyundai Kona Hybrid and Kia Niro Hybrid boxing it out in the lucrative hybrid SUV sector
Hybrids are huge business. Every manufacturer needs one in its range to succeed in 2019 and beyond – and when information technology comes to sales success, at the infinitesimal there's no better style to combine this powertrain tech than with an SUV body. With the excellent Kona Electric under its belt, Hyundai has released a standard hybrid version of its small SUV.
Sister house Kia did the reverse. It started with a hybrid version of the Niro, so added the brilliant eastward-Niro to the range. So while the two brands have ended upwards at the aforementioned point (this Niro Hybrid is likewise new, having received a facelift earlier this year) they've done information technology in different ways.
This doesn't matter all that much, though; what does is the efficiency, practicality, tech and general all-circular usability for these frugal family unit cars.
Head-to-head
| Model: | Hyundai Kona Hybrid Premium | Kia Niro Self-Charging Hybrid '3' |
| Cost: | £24,295 | £26,770 |
| Engine: | 1.vi-litre 4cyl petrol/electric | one.half-dozen-litre 4cyl petrol/electric |
| Power/torque: | 139bhp/265Nm | 139bhp/265Nm |
| Transmission: | Half-dozen-speed dual-clutch automatic, front end-bicycle drive | Six-speed dual-clutch automatic, front-wheel drive |
| 0-60mph: | ix.v seconds | nine.2 seconds |
| Top speed: | 115mph | 101mph |
| Test economic system: | 47.8mpg | 50.6mpg |
| CO2/tax: | 101g/km/£135 | 99g/km/£135 |
| Options: | Metallic paint (£565), SmartSense prophylactic pack (£950) | Metallic pigment (£585) |
Hyundai Kona Hybrid
- For: Peachy infotainment and tech, Premium trim gets a adept balance of kit versus toll, easy to drive
- Against:Jiggly ride, coarse engine, non every bit economic as Kia Niro on test
The chassis compages the Kona Hybrid is based on means a hybrid was e'er a distinct possibility, and since diesel sales have dropped information technology makes more sense for the firm to offer this petrol/electric model rather than a downsized turbodiesel for those who want a bit more efficiency.
More reviews
Like the Kia, it's a 1.6-litre four-cylinder non-turbo petrol engine and a ane.56kWh lithium-ion battery supplying an electrical motor in the gearbox that evangelize this efficiency potential. The petrol unit produces 104bhp while the electric motor kicks out 43bhp and a more impressive 170Nm of torque to bolster the total combined figures up to 139bhp and 265Nm, identical to the Kia's. But the Hyundai was slightly slower from 0-60mph, taking 9.5 seconds compared with 9.2 for the Niro, and its in-gear dispatch tests from 30-50mph and 50-70mph were a few tenths behind the Kia, also.
Neither car feels fast, so information technology'south not worth really working the engines hard for a few reasons. Firstly, the 1.vi-litre motor sounds fibroid when you rev it out, so refinement takes a big dip. Secondly, it saps efficiency, too. Thirdly, the six-speed dual-clutch gearbox can sometimes go a little caught out; its shifts are sluggish anyhow, so information technology's all-time to use the electric motor's torque to help carry y'all along and accept a significant corporeality of the load off the petrol engine. It's smoother and more refined drivinglike this, and you lot'll as well see better mpg figures.
Premium trim gets 18-inch alloy wheels and the ride is jiggly, so it's not quite as polish as the Kia. Over typically bumpy and corkscrewing British country roads the Kona writhes around and never actually settles down, feeling a little skittish if you hit a particularly large bump in a corner where the automobile tin can get deflected off line. It'southward better on a motorway, where the combination of petrol and electric power besides helps keep racket down and refinement good. Yet hit a big ridge in the road at these higher speeds and the Kona'due south suspension all the same takes a large whack, struggling to cope with the energy involved.
No doubt the SE model on xvi-inch wheels would ride amend, but it doesn't get the same impressive level of kit equally Premium. The big bonus is the new x.25-inch infotainment screen that comes on the Premium spec and in a higher place. It gets nav, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, with wireless charging to proceed your device topped upward, plus an upgraded stereo.
Other kit includes climate and prowl control, parking sensors and a rear-view camera, and keyless operation. The only options are metallic paint (£565) and Hyundai's SmartSense safety pack (£950), which is a worthwhile investment.
Testers' notes
• Display:Infotainment is a highlight. Not only does the screen piece of work well, its position on the dash is great, too.• Equipment:Although the Kona is cheaper, information technology misses out on some of the Niro'south standard safety kit, such as AEB. Adding this brings the cars' prices closer.• Materials:Build and material quality is fine, and simply marginally trails that of the Kia.
Kia Niro Hybrid
- For:Updated infotainment and styling work well, more spacious than Hyundai, more efficient, as well
- Against: Suffers from the same problems with ride and refinement equally the Kona Hybrid
Given Hyundai and Kia are sis companies, information technology's no surprise that this Niro Hybrid shares much of its tech with the Kona. That means the i.half-dozen-litre four-cylinder naturally aspirated petrol unit and electric motor deliver a total of 139bhp and 265Nm of torque, identical figures to the Hyundai.
The Niro sprinted from 0-60mph in 9.two seconds, undercutting its rival by 0.3 seconds, while it was always a few tenths ahead in our in-gear flexibility assessments, likewise. Here yous tin feel the ane.56kWh lithium-ion battery and electric motor'south boost as it augments the petrol unit, which feels weak and strained when the electricity runs out.
Functioning isn't what this pair of hybrids is about, though; instead they're easy to drive and more often than not relaxing in the right state of affairs. They're ameliorate suited to employ around boondocks than country roads, only the Niro does soak up scars and cracks on B-roads better than the Kona, although it still bobbles around a flake. At least you can make decent progress without troubling the petrol engine when you lot're in boondocks, where refinement is at its best. The same is true of the Hyundai given both share the same powertrain. Merely think to use a light throttle to keep it in electric mode.
Kia calls the Niro a 'self-charging' hybrid; what this ways is that the car recoups free energy through its motor working in opposite when slowing downward, while the petrol engine can besides charge the battery. Information technology's not as sophisticated every bit a plug-in hybrid and doesn't have as large a battery and therefore equally much all-electric range, only then it'south as well non as expensive.
However, in iii trim the Kia costs £2,475 more than the Hyundai in Premium spec (although our pictures evidence a range-topping Niro 4). You'll demand to become for 3 trim or above to become the new ten.25-inch infotainment system, which is a prissy feature.
You lot also get more safety kit than on the Kona, with autonomous braking fitted as standard. It's an increasingly important detail on new cars that is optional on the Hyundai, which could sway your ownership decision. Fitting the condom pack on the Kona closes the price gap to £1,525.
The Kia has eighteen-inch rims, leather upholstery for its heated, electrically adaptable seats, a heated steering cycle, dual-zone climate control and adaptive prowl, too. Also included are Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, wireless telephone charging, saturday-nav, a reversing camera with all-round parking sensors plus more safety tech, and then given it's amend equipped the cost divergence doesn't wait as great once yous investigate information technology further. A Kona Hybrid Premium SE, which gets this kind of kit as standard, costs £27,195.
Tester'due south notes
• Display:Niro has the same strong infotainment gear up-upwards as the Kona, but it'due south non as well integrated into the nuance.• Manual:Kia shares its half dozen-speed DCT gearbox with the Hyundai. It'southward ho-hum to shift and can be hesitant.• Materials:Leather trim helps make the Niro feel more upmarket. Build quality is on par with the Kona'south.
Verdict
Offset place: Kia Niro Hybrid
The Niro's actress efficiency and practicality sealed the win. At that place's zip to split the cars on tech, but the updates have worked in the Kia'due south favour. Cheaper 2 trim is even better value, but we'd pay the extra for three over the Kona Hybrid because the Kia is the (slightly) more versatile machine.
2nd identify: Hyundai Kona Hybrid
This new Hybrid has added more appeal to the Kona range, simply while its on-newspaper efficiency is great, it couldn't quite match the Kia'due south economy, although it'll exist very price-constructive to run. The tech impresses and it's cheaper than a 3-spec Niro, but lacks the Kia'due south practicality and superior ride.
Now take a await at our top ten best hybrid cars to buy...
Source: https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/hyundai/kona/108486/hyundai-kona-hybrid-vs-kia-niro-hybrid
0 Response to "hyundai kona equivalent"
Post a Comment